I had known Maya Nasser after tweeting him and asking him about the daily happenings in Aleppo and elsewhere in Sryia. About a Month ago for me personally he started to feel like a new friend to me.
Maya Nasser was the most kindest, purest reporters that i have seen on the social media he would never block users when you debate with him, whatever that user may be an actual person or troll yes he also had replied to trolls that were targeting him.
Maya Nasser is a Syrian Born who moved in Iran and had started working for the Iranian news agency Press TV.
Maya Nasser escaped death a couple of weeks ago when he and his team fell in a trap by set up the Free Syrian Army Thugs in Aleppo. On his way back from Aleppo, Murtada also escaped death less than 10 days ago when a shrapnel injured him.
Nasser had received death threats earlier from the FSA terrorists.
Before a month ago Nasser tweeted and stated the following tweets.
"Whenever militias discover they have no incubator environment, they intend to bribe ppl, if didn't work then killing ppl is their jihadi way " Early August
"As long as their targets are contained with words fine, but some moved to bullets three times in the past three weeks.."
Yesterday Maya Nasser his colleague Hussein Murtada was injured by a sniper in Damascus when Maya, the reporter from PressTV & Hussein the head of Al Alam TV bureau in Syria, went to cover the explosion this morning at the Omayyad Square."Thanks my friend, It was close but again that means we are doing something right." 16 Aug
As a journalist Maya Nasser knew the risks and was brave to be in the line of fire in order to cover and the truth from Sryia. Maya my friend, you were martyred, they wanted to silence you because they feared the truth they wanted Maya to pass there lies to the whole world.
We had vowed to keep telling the truth and we promise you to keep defacing the criminals until they’re tried in a justice court and punished.
The Free Syrian Army crimes for killing a Journalist and there other crimes will not go unpunished.
May you Rest in peace my friend, may God his holy Almighty God accept you in his heavenly kingdom along with the martyrs, the prophets and their companions, as he promised the martyrs.
AFP Today Published a video showing the Free Syrian Fighters training Child & Teenager soldiers A while later after the video was published by AFP on YouTube users disliked the video there were six dislikes at the moment while the video was still available.
But after just a few short hours during today, AFP removed the video and later republished the video on YouTube with some pro free Syrian army commentators whom the majority of them aren't even Syrian.
AFP republished the video retitled " Young rebels train to end Syria 'tyranny' " when i saw the title i thought that AFP must had been hacked or that they were joking but unfortunately AFP wasn't joking.
Apparently AFP is very proud of the fact that the Free Syrian Army are now using child soldiers and have been using them since last year. The UN were alerted to the fact the FSA has started using Child soldiers as a report stated in March.
Although most of the FSA comments in the YouTube video section are made by paid bloggers and worshipers of the radical cleric supporters. There is just one comment which makes sense by the user .
As the video suggests twenty young rebel recruits prepare for what their instructors call a campaign to "rid Syria of tyranny" at a training camp in the northern Syrian town of Aazaz, 60 kilometres north of Aleppo in what appears to be an old car hangar yard.
In the video AFP blurred the face of the FSA child solider trainee, as they claim did it for safety reasons but why would AFP blurry the face of the FSA child solider trainee if this is a war crime committed by the Free Syrian.
This is not the first time that the uses of Child Soldiers by the Free Syrian Army have been reported by the western mainstream news outlets.
One of the young child solider in the video is no older then 10 years to 12 years old. Judging by the face expressions these kids made they weren't willing.
How further low can our western mainstream news outlets go by defending the Jihadists in Aleppo, Sryia?
Protests in Moscow Metro Trying to Destabilize Russia
As witnessed last year those Russian protests are heavily and highly timed the more i see of these protests while there is another American NGO USAID funded civil war happening in Sryia could these protests that had occurred last year and are again reoccurring again today.
These protests have only one purpose and goal that is destabilization as it was done in 2000 and in Egypt, Libya, Sryia.
In Moscow the usual subject protesters demanded that Putin and his reelected goverment release the Free Pussy Riot, but the question is just who are the opposition in Russia? the western mainstream news outlets talking heads had already asked the same following question.
At the same western mainstream news outlets with the likes of CNN,BBC, aljazeera,telegraph,guardian and other news outlets. Previously had claimed that the opposition had supporters around 50,000 but as seen with Sryia and Libya protest we cant always rely by the claims that on the western mainstream news outlets makes, there own reporting speaks for itself.
Questionable timing ,Claims made by the opposition.
Interestingly enough these protests that are happening now in Moscow are very questionable due to the fact that we just witnessed selected Islamic countries raging there vents towards the American agenda and its foreign policy which is why i highly doubt it was really about the movie.
As reported by our MSM today that the opposition claims that they would reach atleast yet again with the claims of 50,000 people.
"The opposition expects 50,000 people to march down a central Moscow boulevard near the Kremlin on Saturday to urge Putin to resign, resuming protests that began after a disputed parliamentary election won by his party last December.
From SkinHeads to The Communists and to the Far left are the Opposition directed by former Serbian Otpor members, now aiding the Russian coded Otpor
Waving nationalist flags, brandishing placards calling for early elections or wearing T-shirts in support of jailed members rock band Pussy Riot, the diverse groups of protestors began marching with the chant "1-2-3, Putin go!".
Police said that 5,000 people had already joined the protest but organiser and far-left leader Sergei Udaltsov said that at least 15,000 were involved in the early stages.leader Sergei Udaltsov, nationalist, Trained by America.
is a radical Russian communist youth group. Its website describes it as an "independent youth organization, entering the all-Russian public political motion." Its "territory of action" is Russia,
Its "territory of action" is Russia, which it insists is still the heart and soul of "the republic of the USSR." The AKM's ideology is Marxism-Leninism and it forms part of the Left Front alliance. The unofficial leader of the AKM is Sergei Udaltsov (Сергей Удальцов), who has been arrested several times for protesting against Vladimir Putin's regime
The name of the organization is the backronym of AKM, a model of the well-known Kalashnikov assault rifle. Its organizational structure uses military terminology: battalion, brigade. Most cities will house an "отделение" or squad of AKM, with several squads forming a battalion. Currently battalions exist in Moscow and St. Petersburg.
Kagarlitsky quotes a young AKM radical as shouting: "We will turn Moscow into Paris!" It is unclear how much support the AKM currently has from other organizations in Russia, or whether it truly plans on becoming a vanguard party.
In October 2008, the AKM joined the Left Front, an alliance of revolutionary Marxist and anarchist groups.
From the radical communists to the far left wing groups these are whom that America and Sen John McCain wants them to led Russia if they re copy what had happened in Sryia, Libya i assume these radical groups that are in Russia and had been trained by America and they are awaiting the results from the manufactured Arab Spring and the selected countries.
We should be extremely concerned if Sergei Udaltsov is not the only the leader of an extreme far left wing movement but also if his in charge of an armed splinter radical Russian group.
From rnw it was claimed.
Thousands are expected to attend opposition rallies across Russia on Saturday, with tensions running high over criminal probes into protest leaders and the jailing of punk group Pussy Riot.
More than 16,000 people had signed up on popular social networking sites by Friday to attend the the "March of Millions" rally in Moscow, which the city authorities have sanctioned for up to 25,000 people.
Smaller protests were expected in Russia's second largest city of Saint Petersburg and in regional cities from the western enclave of Kaliningrad to the Far Eastern port of Vladivostok.Russia is a country of 141 million people and the mainstream news outlets had claimed that the Russian opposition has the dwindling support of the general public.
"One of the leaders of the United Russia party has argued that Russia's opposition has dwindling public support and that Saturday's March of Millions protests in Moscow proved this."
"Left Front party leader Sergei Udaltsov and one of the leaders of the Solidarnost (Solidarity) coalition, Boris Nemtsov, represent directly opposite views, Isayev claimed. This means that "the population will stop supporting rallies."
The western mainstream news outlets again as they as stated last year claimed that the protests were in the millions
From left-wing, liberal, nationalist opposition wings to communists These are the Opposition that are protesting Putin and who want take over.
To my surprising the western mainstream news outlets with the likes of the Ukraine news oulets have so far refused to tell its audience and readers that majority of the protesters are nothing then communists and Nazis.
The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia is a political party in Russia. Since its founding in 1991, it has been led by the charismatic and controversial figure Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Opposing both communism and the "wild" capitalism of the 1990s, the party scored a major success in the 1993 Russian Duma elections, receiving a plurality vote.
In the elections in 2007, the party received 8.14% of the vote, giving it 40 of the 450 seats in the State Duma. In the most recent 2011 elections, they increased their percentage to 11.4%. The party's brand and organization are centered around the personality of its leader Zhirinovsky. Despite the party's name, it is frequently described as "neither liberal nor democratic.
The other opposition group are the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the other opposition group the western liberals.
But even with these opposition groups are these really the best choices for the future of Russia? Russia to be controlled by nationalists,radicals, Nazis.
It almost reminds us so well at work that how John McCain and his Friends how they did it in Egypt by bringing in the Muslim Brotherhood into power.
After Yeltsin screwed everything up and Putin has made such efforts to restore both glory and stability, I find it hard to believe that everyone is so unhappy over there.
The Number Game How Many protesters were actually there?
If you read the kyivpost and the western mainstream news outlets sources there usual reporting is one sided and just as before from last year they claimed that there weree at least 7,000 police officers present at the protest rallies.
The mainstream news outlets still maintains the narrative claim that the 100,000 to 500,000 people did came to the protest rallies.
after a summer lull drew tens of thousands of people, determined to show that opposition sentiment remains strong despite Kremlin efforts to muzzle dissent.
The street protests broke out after a December parliamentary election won by Putin's party through what observers said was widespread fraud, and they grew in strength ahead of Putin's effectively unopposed election in March to a third presidential term.
Huge rallies of more than 100,000 people even in bitter winter cold gave many protesters hope for democratic change. These hopes have waned, but opposition supporters appear ready to dig in for a long fight.
Leftists, liberals and nationalists mixed with students, teachers, gay activists and others as they marched down Moscow's tree-lined boulevards chanting "Russia without Putin!" and "We are the power here!" Many wore the white ribbons that have become the symbol of the protest movement.
Sergei Udaltsov, was detained along with a handful of his supporters when he tried to lead a group of about 50 on a new protest march.
Alexei Navalny, a charismatic anti-corruption crusader and a popular blogger, remains the rock star among the protest leaders. When he took the stage, young people in the crowd held up their phones to record the moment.
"Screenshot taken from the National Endowment for Democracy website featuring US funding for the NGO “Golos.” Golos allegedly was searching for “election irregularities.” Golos and other US-backed NGOs and opposition parties are now attempting to trigger an “Arab Spring” in Russia."
Navalny urged the demonstrators to show resolve and keep up the pressure on the Kremlin with more street protests.
This line about the protesters from the news article is rather interesting it states a lot more in detail, for insistence.
The rally appeared as big as the last major protest in June, which also attracted tens of thousands. More of the demonstrators, however, came not as members of the varied political organizations that make up the protest movement, but with groups of friends and co-workers, some of them organizing on social networks.
"however, came not as members of the varied political organizations that make up the protest movement, but with groups of friends and co-workers, some of them organizing on social networks."
This report is from ria.ru
"While some observers expect tens of thousands to attend, only around 3,200 people have confirmed their attendance on the event’s Facebook page."
According to the daily times of Pakistan the moment they started quoting an AFP estimate for the actually estimated amount of protesters whom were there, the AFP estimate.
Some 40,000 people turned out for the “March of Millions”, according to an AFP estimate, in line with organisers’ expectations but down on the massive first protests that first rocked Moscow in December and rallied over 100,000.
Police and organizers gave vastly different estimates, accusing each other of not knowing how to count. Police said that 14,000 people joined the protest, but organizer and far-left leader Sergei Udaltsov saw at least 150,000. Waving nationalist flags, brandishing placards calling for early elections or wearing T-shirts in support of jailed punk band Pussy Riot, protestors hoped to build on the anger created by fraud-tainted elections and Putin’s 12-year grip on power.On Sat Reuters claimed the opposition had shown its strength by claiming that 50,000 people had attracted at the protest rallies.
Witnesses said opposition leaders appeared to have achieved their goal of attracting at least 50,000 people, enough to maintain the momentum of their nine-month-old movement but almost certainly too few to increase alarm in the Kremlin.In the same Reuters article it had claimed that the poll ratings for Putin were falling however without adding any references nor mentions of which poll had showed that Putin poll were falling.
Even so, opinion polls show Putin's ratings, although still high by Western standards, are falling.It claims that the opinion polls in Russia show Putin's ratings are still high by western standards are falling without referencing to which Russian opinion poll had shown that Putin were falling.
The article mentions who are the opposition.
"There was also more focus on social problems than at previous protests, and more communists marched this time with nationalists, liberals, gay rights campaigners and leftists."Russia's Opposition Divided
In a AFP article it has stated that the Russian opposition remained divided after the protests came to a close at 10:00 pm it went further on to state that the opposition were not getting the strength neither the support they were expecting.
Russian opposition leaders argued Sunday over the turnout and success of the latest rally defying President Vladimir Putin, after tens of thousands marched through central Moscow.
The rally on Saturday, called the March of Millions, featured playful T-shirts and slogans mocking Putin and calling for the release of jailed punk band Pussy Riot, but crowds thinned long before it ended at 10:00 pm.
Police put numbers at around 14,000, down from 18,000 at a previous rally in June. But rally organizers gave varying estimates of up to 150,000.
"Prominent protest organiser Sergei Udaltsov of the radical Left Front movement put numbers far higher, at 150,000, but argued the rally had failed to make any political impact."Protest organizer and leader of the radical Far left movement claimed to an reporter that he had witnessed 150,000 people at the protest.
The prominent far left proclaimed on twitter that the protest is not declining and claimed that its the the authorities are ignoring the actually numbers but these 150,000 figure count came from, Sergei Udaltsov.
"put numbers far higher, at 150,000, but argued the rally had failed to make any political impact."
Sergei Udaltsov as seen in the picture his rally was small centered so where has Sergei Udaltsov came up with the 150,000 if there weren't that many protesters? the reasoning for that is because the number came from Sergei.
The number that Sergei made up with no other sources then himself.
"Police put numbers at around 14,000, down from 18,000 at a previous rally in June. But rally organisers gave varying estimates of up to 150,000."
" There were not more than 20,000 people at the march to the rally," wrote Vedomosti."
The Russian Opposition remains divided after the protests had ended last weekend, with no clear objective on what would the opposition do after and if Putin is gone. Since the protests of last the opposition which is funded through by USAID.
Have not proposed any policy chances regarding there own platform which only calls for Putin to step down.
With USAID closing down its operations for influencing inside Russia, the opposition now no longer have any means of funding which they can get. For there operations inside Russia which are directed by America and its NGO counter parts.
Well this picture speaks for itself as the old saying goes a picture is worth a thousand words, while i was tweetng a twitter follower tweeted an aljazeera on about the Sryian conflict as the the title says
France and UK say all options open on Syria.
I couldn't believe it at first maybe it was an eye trick or an illusion that was caused by the camera but it wasn't, these two secretariats weren't just faking there smiles they were serious about there smiles.
It was an article written by no other then the Qatar regime own propaganda news channel aljazeera in which it claimed that , Britain and France that all options are open on Syria.
From the article.
"We also have to be clear that anything like a safe zone requires military intervention and that of course is something that has to be weighed very carefully."
Fabius said Paris and London were in "complete unity ... on this point".
The reason Sryia wont be like another Libya is because of the key factors and those are Sryia is a an allied member of Russia, China,Iran attacking an allied member of either countries would be as if your attacking either China,Russia.Following the news conference, the UN said any proposals to set up to secure safe zones raised "serious questions" and
would need to be studied carefully.
Russia since the cold war days has been giving advanced air defense and upgraded Russian grade defense military arms and tools, with this NATO even knows that the Sryian AA and there triple AAA battery systems would shred NATO jet fighters into pieces.
The other factor are those other regional countries near Sryia whom would see the NATO led intervention as an attack on there own country and would likely cause a stir in the event that NATO would attack Sryia.
This is why Sryia is highly unlikely to be repeated as another Libya or Egypt, when i keep hearing that America,French,Britain both have contingency plans that says they believe that Sryia would be another Egypt.
Which i highly doubt this scenario. In Egypt the colored revolution was highly influenced by western non-governmental organizations these same NGOs that have created a secret splinter group within Serbia during the start and before the start of the Serbian revolution the otpor.
Those sames groups,people who have created the otpor are behind the creation of the LCC group in Sryia same group different codename.
But this article and the video the moment they start to smile really started bothering me they are almost as if they are enjoying themselves, regardless the loss of life either Assad or Rebel/Terrorists dont these people have a human heart anymore?
Why would they smile so happily and willing when asked an question about Sryia by an reporter? either way the moment i keep thinking about the more disgusted i feel about it.
They dont seem to care at all when they would start bombing Sryia and start bombing the entire civilian population areas.
When that occurs neither Assad nor the rebel/Terrorists would be able to govern Sryia at its fullness.