Political Incorrectness & The Truth

Gingrich openly saying he works for Israel basically.
Source


 Romney:

 Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney critizised the approach of U.S. President Barack Obama vis a vis Iran on Wednesday, saying he should have communicated that a military option is not only on the table, but "in our hand."

 Gingrich:

Gingrich added that he would support a preemptive strike if an Israeli prime minister, "haunted by the history of the Holocaust", were to call him and say, "I believe in the defense of my country." "If you think a madman is about to have nuclear weapons and you think that madman is going to use those nuclear weapons, then you have an absolute moral obligation to defend the lives of your people by eliminating the capacity to get nuclear weapons," said Ginrich.

If Israel calls me and says attack Iran, I will attack Iran, that's what Newt is saying.

 Santorum: 

Former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum said Obama was not doing enough with regards to a Iran, and reminded Americans of his bill at the Senate that encouraged sanctioning Iran's nuclear program

Santorum claims he wants  More sanctions but we know from the debates he wants war too.

 Paul: 

 Rep. Ron Paul was the voice of dissent on the topic, arguing that not even Israel claims Iran has a nuclear weapon. "I think what we're doing is encouraging them to have a weapon, because they feel threatened. If you look at a map of Iran, we have 45 bases around their country, plus our submarines. The Iranians can't possibly attack anybody. And we're worrying about the possibility of one nuclear weapon. If you want to worry about nuclear weapons, worry about the nuclear weapons that were left over from the Soviet Union. They're still floating around. "

Well GOP Listen up, if you want war, oil to 300$ a barrel, thousands of dead troops and hundreds of thousands of dead civilians, vote for Gingrich, Romney or Santorum. If you want Israel to take care of their own business and want the troops home, vote Ron Paul.

No offense meant but If Israel has a problem with a country why dont they send there own military forces in and deal with the problem? why ask America or Canada to do what Israel wants?

After all  Israel military hardware  is from the united states so i am sure they can handle themselves quite well.

I can't help but notice how quick they are to send other people's children to war. And for what? Because Israel wants us to?  again no offense, but let them send their own kids off to a bloody conflict. And let's not even talk about how much this will cost

 And now Hillary wants to intervene in Syria yet America has a thousand of spy  satellites around the global surely they will know whats really going on and happening in Syria before the lying mainstream media news outlets.


The Mainstream media news outlets are now creating such emotional stories just so to swing  in  more support for the intervention.

When will CNN learn that there tricks aren't going to work the second time? they did it with Libya and look  how Libya turned  into, a huge mess  the Libyan Rebel NTC even allowed a former president of a country whose a war criminal on the run he was allowed into Libya.


What Great Success? Women in libya only had got 20 seats in the senate yeah some great democracy there, I can See Syria will be like Libya.


The Reason the elites want to take out Assad is so they can took over the whole northern African region with the africom.

Already africom has a guide on about Libya titled  FACT SHEET: Libya - People and Places 
Pronunciation Guide


Now surely the whole idea of these Coms centers or Networks isn't just about Protecting Americas interests right? personally i view of them as occupations.