Romney's top contributors so far in his campaign:
Goldman Sachs $535,680
JPMorgan Chase & Co $375,650
Morgan Stanley $323,800
Credit Suisse Group $299,160
Citigroup Inc $282,765
Bank of America $277,850
Kirkland & Ellis $222,702
Barclays $221,650
PricewaterhouseCoopers $191,500
HIG Capital $188,500
Blackstone Group $178,800
Wells Fargo $163,200
UBS AG $156,550
Bain Capital $154,000
EMC Corp $128,300
Citadel Investment Group $122,125
Elliott Management $121,000
Bain & Co $113,300
Sullivan & Cromwell $107,150
The Villages $97,500
Obama:
Microsoft Corp $289,088
DLA Piper $217,582
Google Inc $167,565
University of California $157,092
Harvard University $155,808
Morgan & Morgan $130,145
Comcast Corp $127,700
Skadden, Arps et al $119,074
Sidley Austin LLP $116,227
Time Warner $109,442
US Dept of State $106,040
Debevoise & Plimpton $92,026
National Amusements Inc $88,014
Stanford University $87,858
Kaiser Permanente $87,502
University of Chicago $87,100
US Government $86,589
Columbia University $84,722
Latham & Watkins $82,783
Wilmerhale Llp $81,455
Opensecrets
The Banks Are All Behind Romney ...by contributions...they have abandoned Obama. It wasn't like this in 2008. Obama seems to be a mix of nearly everything else....colleges, businesses, half of his contributions are small donors (those who likely don't have lots of money). Seems the banks no longer like Obama. That's a good thing in my book.
As for individual contributions...
Romney:
Small Individual Contributions $7,475,825 (10%)
Large Individual Contributions $66,707,893 (90%)
Obama:
- Small Individual Contributions $71,131,811 (45%)
- Large Individual Contributions $87,685,293 (56%)
Almost all of Romney's money is coming from the wealthy...Obama has raised more overall...but i think that will change soon...as he's obviously the only one campaigning on his side.
This shows the problem Romney has with relating with the average American as well. He's the Wall Street candidate who is nearly exclusively funded by the rich.
It doesn't get any more blatant than this.
But Wait that's not only thing that is more blatant.
Whats blatant is that both of these men,are proof,that the two party system has failed.
Seriously,They are both BAD for America.
Almost all of Romney's money is coming from the wealthy...Obama has raised more overall...but i think that will change soon...as he's obviously the only one campaigning on his side.
This shows the problem Romney has with relating with the average American as well. He's the Wall Street candidate who is nearly exclusively funded by the rich.
And i would also like to point out that Romney's top contributors are all speculating on oil futures...driving up costs at the pump and virtually everything else for the rest of us.
Isn't that something?
The ot so different are they?
The Contributions, some math:
Romney:
Small Individual Contributions $7,475,825 (10%)
Large Individual Contributions $66,707,893 (90%)
Obama:
- Small Individual Contributions $71,131,811 (45%)
- Large Individual Contributions $87,685,293 (56%)
Helping the middle class, indeed.
Or should i dare to say helping the Corporations. Makes you wonder if the Corporations are the ones electing the candidates because it would make sense that Romney is the only one winning so far almost every delegates in the republican primary.
Don't Forget These are the same Contributions that yes that funded both Sen John McCain & Obama in the 2008 general election.
The Two Party is a complete failure, almost in every country, would a multi party system would it make any differences or changes? that i dont know the way i see it.
The elites are ruling everything they touch with Money and Corporations. But a multi party system wont be a bad idea considering.
The Two Party system is like living in a two party dictatorship, with the claims of democracy and freedom of speech.
Even though our rights every day are slowly disappearing in front of us.
Romney,McCain Obama,Harper, Paul martin Whats the differences?
Absolutely none.
0 comments:
Post a Comment