Here are the recent reports
From the recent reports police are arresting Voters for no good reason at all, Cameras were banned to film the voting and more.

From the Ron Paul Camp

Here's what went down

We had about 300+ Paul supporters at the caucus, but we didn't have a majority. Our camp made a deal with the Romney camp to shut out Santorum and we'd still get our chair and Romeny would get delegates and secretary.

There was a ban on cameras. The temporary chair said before we proceeded the guy recording needed to stop bc it was against the rules. The guy yelled it was for transparency and the chair directed police to remove him which the crowd bood and catcalled. It was Romney and Paul supporters, and possibly some Santorum people that were all upset about this. The boos drowned out the chair to the point he couldn't even hear himself and the police withdrew and called in backup. 9 cops showed up one with a motorcycle helmet on. The guy by then had taken the camera off the tripod and we proceeded with the pledge and invocation. Then the temp chair appointed a parliamentarian which is something the elected chair is supposed to do. All points of order were ignored. He then appointed the credentials and rules committee. All poitns of order ignored. He then opened the floor to nominations for the chair which the entire audience was chanting "brent stafford" who was our guy. The temp chair ignored him and instead called one of his buddies on the committee and said he won by voice vote. Points of order and division were ignored.

At that point the "elected" chair was getting booed and people were chanting and screaming. He adjourned the meeting and said the police will arrest everyone for trespassing.

The Paul, Romney, and Santorum floor leaders told everyone to stay. We eventaully all went outside to figure out what we were going to do. When we got out there, there was state, local city, county cops and a police helicopter circling overhead. Brent Stafford stood on a chair and told everyone what we needed to do but we needed to do it quick before the SWAT team gets called. 2 minutes later he was arrested and is currently being held. Still trying to figure out what his bail was.

We all went to a park down the street. Romney, Paul, and Santorum people.

If anyone wants to call the St. peters police and demand they release Brent please do. 636-278-2222

More Sources

Ron Paul ignored

Obviously, a large number of people are of the mind that they're sufficiently okay with any of the candidates, as long as that candidate isn't Paul.

 Largest MO Caucus Adjourns WITHOUT Conducting Business – No Delegates Selected

Never underestimate the ability of Republicans to let loose with both barrels directly into their own foot!

Missouri’s February primary, won by Rick Santorum, was a non-binding beauty contest. Delegates are to be awarded this year through the caucus process, and the St Charles County Caucus was to be held today, March 17.

The Caucus meeting was NEVER brought to order.

Standing rules established by the Central Committee included the prohibition of cameras, video or sound recording. This did not sit well with the caucus goers.

One particular individual protested the demand to put away his camera. Central Committee Chairman, Eugene Dokes refused to gavel the meeting to order until the camera was put away.

Caucusgoers sided, quite vocally, with the cameraman! And at that moment Stokes lost control of the caucus! Rather than address the question, perhaps calling the meeting to order and entertaining a motion and a vote on the subject, Dokes dug in his heels. Police were called. Threats of eviction and arrest were made. The caucusgoers became further disaffected, beligerant and resentful.


The venue was booked only till 1:00PM and at 11:30 the meeting still hadn’t been gaveled to order. After amassing what appeared to be nearly the entire St Charles County police department on site, including a circling helicopter, Dokes singlehandedly appointed a chairman of the caucus and other officers – without a vote. This again raised objection from the floor.

After handing the gavel to now appointed Caucus Chair Matt Ehlen, Mr Ehlen called for a motion to adjourn. This was seconded by one of Dokes’ appointees, and the caucus was adjourned over the loud objection of the floor.

No business was conducted. No delegates were selected. Attendees were threatened with arrest for trespassing if they did not immediately vacate the premises. The entire affair was a comedy of mismanagement.

Whatever the results of the Missouri caucuses statewide are, they will have been tainted and skewed by the lack of representation from the largest contingent of Republicans in the state.

If establishment Republicans wonder why the support from the grassroots is waning, the blatent disregard for those who vote them into office and to whom they should be answerable, as exhibited in this circus of a “caucus”, should be ample answer for them!

 Source

 Tweets

 TheFerg ‏ @christoferguson Reply Retweeted Favorite · Open

Santorum people made up fake rules, handed then out, and claim they must be followed and will not accept votes to amend.

 Well it recently sounds like there is a Chaos  in the American elections too isn't there? and arresting an outstanding citizen just because he was following and voting for Ron Paul? 


And There was the Western Mainstream media blaming Putin for voter Fraud,Vote Rigging in Russia i wonder you think the Mainstream Media news outlets will report any of this i highly doubt that they will unless the voting is in Russia they sure will.

Banning cameras to film in case of vote rig? that is strange for sure i guess the GOP establishment are doing everything to prevent Ron Paul from winning in which they already have done that in several states.

This article is from demandprogress and so far the Cooperate Lobbying Mainstream news networks  have been silent on the whole topic of this new bill by the McCrazy, John McCain, only a few  outlets have reported on it without further delay here is the source.

McCain cybersecurity bill

Quote:

Will you fight back against McCain's legislation by adding your name at right?

There's a power struggle brewing over cybersecurity, with two Senate factions butting heads.  One group is backing a bill that is - surprisingly - not horrendous in its privacy implications.  (You can take partial credit for this, as that bill was written with every desire to avoid awakening the powerful coalition that killed SOPA a few weeks ago.)

But McCain's side wants to enable the military to snoop on civilian Internet users: 

As Reuters notes,  the "types of information that could be shared are broad, and the data would go to 'cybersecurity centers' that specifically include the National Security Agency's Threat Operations Center and the U.S. Cyber Command Joint Operations Center."
We have a key opportunity to help steer this debate away from McCain's inanity and towards a more reasonable alternative.

Just sign up at right to email your lawmakers in opposition to McCain's bill.

 Basically John McCain Cyber  bill would allow the military rather then the Police departments,FBI to Snoop on Your emails, Web Traffic and who knows maybe even a lot more harm then good.

I am not surprised to see come from Sen John McCain after all he has been proven to be a War Hawkish Republican a true War Mongering Elite.

And Crazy on the  foreign policy side he has been going to Libya siding with the rebels doing a little photo OP Pose with them, and then he went into Syria before things got heated.

Sided with the Syrian opposition, without realizing that  (if he knows) the Syrian opposition has been backed by terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda,Hezbollah.

Even the  the Syrian opposition leader has stated in a interview even with the fall of Assad the ties with Hezbollah would be the same, ironic isn't it?


A few days ago Sen John McCain called for the US Air strikes on Assad Ground Forces basically starting a new Regime Change or more simply put as Libya 2.0

Global Montreal | Most Canadians support online surveillance bill: poll

TORONTO – While Ottawa has faced a fierce backlash over a new online surveillance bill, a new poll suggests that a majority of Canadians are in favor the contentious proposal.

Fifty-six per cent of Canadians say they support Bill C-30 as it stands, and a minority – 21 per cent – oppose the measures introduced by Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, results of an exclusive poll for Global News and Postmedia News revealed Tuesday.

 Its Fear Mongering Claims NeoCon MP

Simcoe-Grey MP Kellie Leitch spoke with Metroland Media on Friday about the federal government's controversial Bill C-30, as well as the government's plans to make changes to the Old Age Security Benefit.
Leitch says Bill C-30 isn't about spying on Canadians' online activity, it's about the safety of children.

The bill is called the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act. Some in opposition believe the bill is a violation of Canadian's online privacy and freedom.

Leitch disagrees.

"I think there is a lack of understanding of what the bill is about," she said.

"Overall, our government is focused on keeping communities safe. Especially when it comes to the safety and security of children, which I feel very passionately about."

She says the bill is not about monitoring Canadians' online activity. She says that message is "fear mongering," from the opposition parties.

Leitch said the bill would not allow police to obtain information without a warrant.

"Will this legislation allow police to monitor online activity without a warrant? The answer is no," she said. "The legislation only compels telecommunications service provider information to designated bodies so we can protect children. That's where the misconceived notions are. That's what the opposition is trying to perpetuate."

Well there we go again next to police chiefs another Conservative Member of Parliament has shown support for the controversial bill C-30 which would allow the police force to give them police state,Big brother powers.


MP Kellie Leitch has gone to far out by claiming the protests on the internet by regular Canadian citizens and others as Fear Mongering by the Opposition parties.

With that kind of statement by the Conservative MP Kellie Leitc it just goes to show that Dictator Harper and his Conservatives  keep on showing that they are hiding something from the Canadian public with this controversial bill C-30.


And in my view it seems  MP Kellie Leitc hasn't read the content of the C-30 otherwise she wouldn't be supporting it.
She still believes that the bill will be Protecting Children from the Internet Predators.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1134227--canada-s-police-chiefs-support-internet-surveillance-bill

The nation’s top cops said during a Vancouver news conference the public doesn’t need to fear the bill.
“People need to focus and keep their eye on the ball,” said Warren Lemcke, Vancouver’s deputy chief constable.

“We can’t monitor your emails. We can’t monitor your phone calls. We can’t monitor your surfing unless a judge allows us to do that.”

The president of the Canadian Police Association said cops aren’t interested in monitoring the communication of Canadians who aren’t committing crimes.
“We’re talking about serious criminal offences,” said Tom Stamatakis.

Sounds like to me the  police chiefs and The president of the Canadian Police Association haven't read the C-30 Surveillance bill.

If they did read it they to would be surprised whats inside of it and thus the police chiefs are jumping on to the guns by supporting which then they are now supporting a Canadian Dictator.

I am sure if the police chiefs did read the bill and whats in it they too would be surprised by the content of the online surveillance bill.

Notice the police chief  little dirty lie here?

“Even if the police wanted, in some pervasive way, to monitor phones, ISPs (of the public), we don’t have the capacity. This is legislation that’s designed to give the police the tools to better deal with serious organized crime.”

Hmm really  president of the Canadian Police Association? maybe you could explain to all Canadians about IP address map  where your top Ontario  detective showed news networks a cluster map of IP 8,000 address or so.
Claiming to be all  Child pornographers on there computers.

I guess the police and this Conservative Dictator want to arrest all innocent Canadians with the claim that they all are part of some serious organized crime yeah what Total Nonsense nothing more then an excuse for defending the C-30 act.


I am sure the Police would have defended ACTA,SOPA to. 

My fellow readers everywhere these are the small steps and the birth of a dictatorship government.  

 http://www.nationalpost.com/life/There+privacy+online+missed/6173511/story.html

There's no privacy online. And it isn't missed

 Well as expected another Journalist fails and falls again into believing and buying into the nonsense that the  "Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act." Otherwise known as  C-30 Bill would somehow protect our children however that isn't the case.


And yes my fellow Canadians that is what Robert Fulford of The National Post  has wrote in his article Privacy isn't and wont missed? really Robert? sounds like Robert Fulford doesn't hang on a lot on the internet otherwise he wouldn't be making BS statements  like these which i have quoted below and will underline how clueless Robert Fulford of The National Post is.

I will also include my analysis on Robert Fulford talking points which are quite wrong under the quotes. 

Privacy is an ancient and once cherished right that has been transformed from a fact of life to a dying memory. And, as Facebook demonstrates several million times a day, a large part of humanity likes it the new way. Clearly, many users of social media think that the more everybody's privacy is violated, the better. Call them extroverts, call them narcissists, and if you like call them flashers. Nevertheless, they have inherited the Earth, or at least a good part of the Internet.

 Around the year 2000 hackers (they could have been Chinese) acquired seven passwords stolen from Nortel executives, including the chief executive. For eight or nine years the hackers ran through the digital synapses of the company, raping and looting, carrying off every R&D report and business plan that took their fancy. Pieces of Nortel having since been sold off, companies that bought them are afraid that they have accidentally acquired undetectable spyware imbedded in some of Nortel's products. The word for that is "rootkit," meaning stealthy malware designed to hide its existence, forever if possible.

So far as I know, not a single authority on computers expressed surprise when the news about WikiLeaks broke. Everyone in the business knew that what WikiLeaks did could be done - and in fact many private firms and nations were doing it already. Today the tricks of rich corporations, rich governments and feckless amateurs are increasingly available on lower levels of hackery.

But it was the response to the bill that struck a curious note of naïvety. People criticizing Toews suggested that he was undermining the sacred principle of privacy. Charlie Angus of the NDP rose to the occasion with high-test hyperbole: "Now, every single Canadian citizen is walking around with an electronic prisoner's bracelet."

It's a terrifying image, but entirely unrelated to reality.

Could it be that people like Angus don't read the news? Do they not know that the term "online privacy" is now pure anachronism? Experience tells us that just about any level of secrecy on the Web can be cracked. Surely that was proven when the WikiLeaks hackers demonstrated that even the U.S. government can't shield secret State Department memos sent by its ambassadors.

My Analysis & POV

It sounds like Robert Fulford of The National Post  doesn't much clearly understand who & what are WikiLeaks nor doesn't he know that  WikiLeaks under the American constitution they are indeed protected.

And its a bit surprising  Robert Fulford in a excuse to back up C-30 he compared Nortel Company hacking incident to millions of other Canadian internet users.
First off  Robert Fulford what happened to Nortel is and was irrelevant because that hacking incident  was the results of unfair business practices, and it was the result of  Corporate espionage.

China is one of those countries where the boundary between government and industry is thin, Skillicorn said.
"They tend to be major players."

I guess  Robert Fulford of The National Post  has left out that part for his readers.

                                    Robert Fulford Wrong Points & Statements

•  Robert Fulford has no right to compare Nortel hacking incident to millions of Canadian internet  users to a Corporate company that has at least 700-1000 or more employers.

 Therefore his statements regrading his hacking statement  on just one huge Corporate company that was known  Nortel  is completely irrelevant.

•  Robert Fulford calling  online privacy  pure anachronism and suggests to Canadian readers that  any level of secrecy on the Web can be cracked.

Here is the quote again.

 Could it be that people like Angus don't read the news? Do they not know that the term "online privacy" is now pure anachronism? Experience tells us that just about any level of secrecy on the Web can be cracked.

I am quite sure  Robert Fulford that Angus does indeed read the news??????? but it looks like you  Robert Fulford clearly don't understand  How to Use Online Privacy surely since  Robert Fulford has sided with Vic Toews and Harper and Its Bill C-30.



I am quite sure he may and will be attacked by  either twitter users or other internet users who are much aware and understand what is Online Privacy.
Robert Fulfordit doesn't seem to spent much time on the internet because when he does he only writes news article columns for the The National Post which would make more sense for his support on the C-30 Bill.


Sorry if i am going to use this word but seriously Robert Fulford has pissed me off with this.

Privacy is an ancient and once cherished right that has been transformed from a fact of life to a dying memory. And, as Facebook demonstrates several million times a day, a large part of humanity likes it the new way. Clearly, many users of social media think that the more everybody's privacy is violated, the better. Call them extroverts, call them narcissists, and if you like call them flashers. Nevertheless, they have inherited the Earth, or at least a good part of the Internet.

                                                    Disgusted Statements.

•  Privacy is an ancient and once cherished right.
•   has been transformed from a fact of life to a dying memory. 

• Clearly, many users of social media think that the more everybody's privacy is violated, the better.

 There you have it my fellow Canadians this why we must stop and protest Bill C-30 people and fake paid Harper, NeoCon  journalists like Mr Robert Fulford of The National Post have no clue what are the true dangerous behind C-30 i am sure if Mr  Robert Fulford had spent more time on the internet.

He wouldn't be writing such Bullshit statements about our Right and our Privacy nor calling Privacy a Dying Memory?
Is that the best  argument or defense of the bill you Harper  conservatives got because if it is its a very weak argument.

And its clear that Robert Fulford of The National Post doesn't hang around Social media nor his computer that is if h has one which i doubt that very much.
I am quite  sure Robert Fulford of The National Post that he will be supporting ACTA,SOPA, PIPA if he was given the chance the article on them.

And no not every level on the web can cracked if that statement made by Robert Fulford is true how come to this day in 2011-2012 no one has been able to hack the pentagon and steal its secret files?
or how come no onehas yet hacked any major worldwide leading banks and stole millions of dollars from rich people?  within a blink of an eye.

 Because no one can do that if that indeed right now companies,rich people would be all in trouble and i don't mean the actress, singers drug trouble.

But financial trouble, financial speaking so just be thankfully that hasn't happened yet otherwise the governments worldwide would lunch an investigation into.
However in all honesty for Robert Fulford of The National Post to claim that there's no privacy online. And it isn't missed its only going to upset a lot of internet users.

The only people who make this statement There's no privacy online. And it isn't missed are usual the ones who don't spent that much time on the computers or on the internet.
I hope a alot of Canadians will be protesting this Censorship,police state act because i believe its time for US Canadians to stand up against Censorship.


America Had its fair share with SOPA,PIPA and these two acts were stopped
Europe is now having  huge protests  in different European countries, and they are against ACTA.

So now  i believe its time for us to stand up and be part of history and if we protest C-30 how will our grandchildren in the future look up to us? will our grandchildren live in a North American Dictatorship If so is that the future that awaits our Grandchildren.

A future that was made by governments telling them how to live?

don't get me wrong i am very much against child porn, however the way they are doing it is a mess much like the war on drugs which that turned out to be a failure.


But the this government is trying to pull off isn't the correct way i guess this conservative government just wants to arrest innocent people.
For the new empty jails that were just recently been build and were on the news By CBC.
Maybe that's why they are trying so hard to pass this C-30 bill that it would be alot  easier to arrest innocent people rather then the real crocks.


The way they are trying doing to with it reminds me of that movie V for Vendetta and where in one scene you see government vans spying on people's lives and even wiretapping  there phone lines.


 That's what it reminds me off & that's what i believe they may try to do with the C-30 Bill destroy our privacy and then if anyone is against the government or its polices arrest them put them in jail.


That is the reason why C-30 must be stopped because innocent people can be arrested and they could be.

Which can further end our rights and create North America into a Dictatorship this is madness where do i even start after i saw the commercial?

The talk on some other people on how they see it.

- The spin is just utterly inescapable in this country.
1. They are now painting the people that commit the piracy as foreign scumbag criminals who digitally invade our country and steal our ideas, property and jobs from completely outside of the country. I know for sure this will hit home for at least some people, effectively transferring their thinking ab out piracy(if they even really knew what it was) from high school kids downloading music for free on the internet, to evil foreigners who mean us harm invading our country and taking our jobs.

Then they go on to end the ad with "It's time for a new idea, tell Congress to stop online piracy"

2. Now that uninformed or indifferent people who don't possess sufficient critical thinking skills think of piracy as theft from Americans and the loss of peoples jobs because of greedy malicious foreigners, THEY ARE GONNA WANT TO TELL CONGRESS TO STOP ONLINE PIRACY POSSIBLY AFTER THIS. One more point, I don't know if I just finally have gotten to the point that I am this cynical, but, say someone just hears about the online protest (probably happened a lot today) in passing, or tomorrow or whenever, described as "Yeah all these people on Facebook and Twitter are talking about SOPA, it was a huge protest" then they see this ad, possibly thinking people are protesting foreigners stealing our property and jobs, they might then instinctively think, "Man a lot of people sure do want to STOP ONLINE PIRACY (SOPA), and I'm just not gonna stand for it either, YAY SOPA's GREAT and will save jobs! Let's get it passed!"

Here's the video

Spread The message! do not stop the protests.



The Good news everyone Only Ron Paul is against the SOPA, PIPA acts Rick Santorum has come out in NH in favor of these acts.

You can bet Newt is for them to, that is unless he lies that his against the acts just to steal the votes.

Spread This
 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/open-ready-to-take-on-sopa-in-congress-2012-01-18

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, the Texas Republican who authored SOPA, on Tuesday dismissed the pending Wikipedia blackout as a “publicity stunt” and vowed to move on with the bill next month.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, meanwhile, has said he will bring the PIPA bill to a vote next week 

You see? a blackout means nothing to those traitors.

If you know Lamar Smith email him.

These two bills new bill or not must not pass. 


I say the American people should start  kicking and voting these  anti-liberty politicians out of Office and especially kicking out OPEN. And start focusing on the country!