Here what was said in that Interview on Andersoon Cooper
 Source mediaite

Borger- A little conflict. On one hand he says he read them on another, he says he didnt, so it is unclear of the editorial relationship. He clearly doesn't want to talk about it.

Erickson - Nobody took him seriously back then. He is the front runner of Iowa. We can scrutinize him on many things. His supporters put my home address and phone numbers on a neo nazi website. We can ask Ron Paul why he allowed these websites to fundraise for him. Explain why he said isrealis set up a concentation camp in Gaza. We can attack him.

Fleischer - If he does win Iowa, Romney is going to be cheering too cuz he will be propelled forward. Iowa is a small 120,000 people energized. Thats what propels his candidacy. I think he is a fringe candidate, and does not represent the Republkican party. I am concerned about his image. His numbers everywhere else are very low. Iowa is his high water mark. He plunges from here on.

Erickson - Newsletters written in first person. Blood donations had AIDs given to heterosexual people. Obama had to defend against Jeremiah Wright.

Honestly Anderson Cooper You brought in your show that Erickson of the Redstate?
Gupta - To be clear, RP has disavowed all those comments. What does this new emergent stuff mean to Iowa now

Borger - Establishment Republians say Iowa is completelt irrelevant if RP wins. It then becomes who is in second. But this is not the message GOP wants to be sending. A message that resnoates here is the message of anti washington, anti big government, anti debt, anti deficit, and it works with voters in Iowa, so there is a real connection with voters in Iowa. 

Personally in my view that was no journalism rather it was more of ambush journalism you know why my readers? because CNN already asked Ron Paul the same question twice.

Rather then sticking to the issues CNNs own Borger saw and used the opportunity to further ambush, i think Miss Borgers should little ashamed about that little dirty tactic.

Yes CNN Brought in that Lying Bag Erick erickson who is that same person that stated the following later on this week

“Rick Perry is just like my dad” 
  Ten contributors to the conservative blog RedState have collaborated on a post endorsing Rick Perry for the presidency. Yes, that Rick Perry. The one who hasn’t led a national poll of Republicans since late September. The one who only makes headlines when he says something amusingly stupid. “Don’t settle,” their headline urges. Don’t settle for someone who doesn’t routinely humiliate himself every single time he attempts to speak extemporaneously.

Perry’s poor communication skills are easily overcome:

Second, debating skill takes on outsize importance in the primaries, when candidates have to stand out on a stage crowded with 7 or 8 people who all agree with each other 80-90% of the time. All Rick Perry needs to do is step onstage and everyone will know how he’s different from Barack Obama.

Source Salon

Erick erickson went to claim that ron paul went to an Iranian news TV news networks he accused Ron Paul suppoters back in 2008 that they posted his home address and phone numbers to a neo nazis web site.

Even though that is not even true at all.

and the other RINO pundit says he wont win? seriously is that the best CNN has got? thats the other reason i stopped watching the news.
And you personally what if CNN was behind the herman cain scandal? after all it was only CNN that those supposed women came on.

I wonder where are those women that accused Herman Cain now?

This another reason why you SHOULD VOTE FOR RON PAUL.

The Mainstream Media with likes of Radio talk hosts like Sean Hannity and CNN knowing that they cant beat him on the issues they attack him on his character image the same tactics they are now using on Ron Paul.

Really no i wonder where are those Blonde Women that accused Herman Cain now? dont forget that it was CNN that was pushing them.


Post a Comment